✉️ ijce@nerdpublication.com 📞 +91-9561854529
🔖 ISSN XXXX-XXXX 🗓️ Bimonthly
International Journal of Computer Engineering Published by NERD Publication
📢 Notices
🔓 Open Access ✓ DOI Assigned
👁️ 20 views  ·  ⬇ 2 downloads
Published inVolume 1, Issue 1 (2020)
Pages1-7
KeywordsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bihar Engineering University, Patna, Bihar, India Department of Information Technology, Jharkhand University of Technology, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Received 22 Aug 2026 Revised 24 Aug 2026 Accepted 27 Aug 2026 Published 29 Aug 2026

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) represent a critical information infrastructure in modern healthcare, yet centralised EHR systems remain vulnerable to single-point-of-failure attacks, unauthorised access, data tampering, and lack of patient-controlled consent mechanisms. India's National Digital Health Mission (NDHM), launched in 2021 under the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) framework, mandates interoperability across 600,000+ health facilities through a federated health ID and linked health record architecture, creating an urgent need for tamper-evident, auditable, and privacy-preserving EHR management infrastructure. This paper proposes and evaluates a permissioned blockchain-based EHR management system built on Hyperledger Fabric 2.4 with InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) hybrid storage, implementing attribute-based access control (ABAC) smart contracts for fine-grained patient consent management. The proposed architecture stores cryptographic hashes and access control metadata on-chain while delegating encrypted EHR document storage to IPFS, achieving a 7.3× reduction in on-chain storage cost versus full on-chain storage. Performance benchmarking using Hyperledger Caliper demonstrates a sustained transaction throughput of 450 TPS with average confirmation latency of 28 ms at block size 50 — outperforming Ethereum PoW (14 TPS, 8,500 ms) and matching Hyperledger Fabric with Kafka consensus (520 TPS) at significantly lower infrastructure complexity. Security analysis across six attributes — data integrity, access control, auditability, privacy, availability, and non-repudiation — demonstrates superiority over centralised EHR alternatives on five of six dimensions. A six-month operational audit across three simulated hospital nodes records 99.2% authorised access compliance with 0.3% anomalous access attempts successfully detected and blocked by smart contract policy enforcement.

References

  1. Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., & Lippman, A. (2016). A case study for blockchain in healthcare: "MedRec" prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. Proceedings of the IEEE Open & Big Data Conference, 13.
  2. Hyperledger Foundation. (2023). Hyperledger Fabric Documentation v2.5. Linux Foundation.
  3. Kumar, R., & Tripathi, R. (2021). Scalable and secure access to IPFS-based healthcare system using blockchain. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 71, 101310.
  4. Mamoshina, P., Ojomoko, L., Yanovich, Y., Ostrovski, A., Botezatu, A., Prikhodko, P., ... & Zhavoronkov, A. (2018). Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare. Oncotarget, 9(5), 5665.
  5. MeitY. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.
  6. MoHFW. (2021). Operational Guidelines: Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  7. Roehrs, A., Da Costa, C. A., Da Rosa Righi, R., Da Silva, V. F., Goldim, J. R., & Schmidt, D. C. (2019). Analyzing the performance of a blockchain-based personal health record implementation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 92, 103140.
  8. Shen, B., Guo, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). MedChain: Efficient healthcare data sharing via blockchain. Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1207.
  9. Wang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Qiu, T., Yuan, Y., Ouyang, L., ... & Wang, F. Y. (2018). Blockchain-powered parallel healthcare systems from the perspective of the ACP approach. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(4), 942-950.
  10. Xia, Q. I., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017). MeDShare: Trust-less medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain. IEEE Access, 5, 14757-14767.
  11. Zhang, P., Schmidt, D. C., White, J., & Lenz, G. (2018). Blockchain technology use cases in healthcare. Advances in Computers, 111, 1-41.
  12. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557-564.

Cite this article

Krishnamurti, A., Wolfe, M. J. (2020). Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Management Using Hyperledger Fabric and IPFS. International Journal of Computer Engineering, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17328472
Aditi Krishnamurti, Marcus J. Wolfe. "Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Management Using Hyperledger Fabric and IPFS." International Journal of Computer Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-7.
@article{AditiKrishnamurti2020, title={Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Management Using Hyperledger Fabric and IPFS}, author={Aditi Krishnamurti and Marcus J. Wolfe}, journal={International Journal of Computer Engineering}, volume={1}, number={1}, pages={1-7}, year={2020}, doi={10.5281/zenodo.17328472} }

Published in

International Journal of Computer Engineering (IJCE)

ISSNXXXX-XXXX
View full issue →

← Back to Volume 1, Issue 1